Reading Response Paper free essay sample

The ability to seize money and use it for your agency along tit the ability to seize houses and valuable items alike only to then sell it back to a citizen of your district or use it for the company seems Like an unfair way of doing business. It keeps local law enforcement up to date with the latest technologies along with the specialized trained teams to use the technologies properly. This gives law enforcement the upper hand on drug dealers and other criminal stateless. Another positive attribute to civil forfeiture Is the possible opportunities It brings to he community. Citizens can purchase items at an otherwise impossible price if bought at a retail price. It provides jobs to the community in law enforcement, law offices, and public services. One final possible positive characteristic of this law is the fear it puts into their citizens and mostly, the offspring of citizens. We will write a custom essay sample on Reading Response Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This law is so dreadful that parents, uncles, aunts, grandparents, and other friends and family will look twice at any possible illegal activity happening on their property (if they knew bout the law).This would create a much healthier and friendly neighborhood if citizens were always looking twice and ridding/correcting the bad blood. These are some possible positives of civil forfeiture, It Is not worth the negatives it brings along. This law takes no pity for excuses or situations and puts even the Innocent out of homes and money even for the slightest of crimes when enforcing civil forfeiture. It does more damage than good. It creates unfaithful citizens due to the fact that the away is unfair and dangerous.A lot of the instances where this law has been enforced happen to those who are most dumbfounded by what is going on. It puts families in turmoil and distances relationships. Overall, it is not a fair way of upholding the law and is clearly a way of making money. Under this view, only a corrupt officer would find this fair. In the end, it is not a fair form of deterrence and punishment. It may be an effective way of deterrence but is most certainly not the right way to abilities citizens, especially considering that they are most likely innocent.